īeckers F, Awad YM, Beiyuan J et al (2019) Impact of biochar on mobilization, methylation, and ethylation of mercury under dynamic redox conditions in a contaminated floodplain soil. īeckers F, Rinklebe J (2017) Cycling of mercury in the environment: sources, fate, and human health implications: a review. īash JO, Bresnahan P, Miller DR (2007) Dynamic surface interface exchanges of mercury: a review and compartmentalized modeling framework. īarnewold L, Lottermoser BG (2020) Identification of digital technologies and digitalisation trends in the mining industry. īao S, Li K, Ning P et al (2017) Highly effective removal of mercury and lead ions from wastewater by mercaptoamine-functionalised silica-coated magnetic nano-adsorbents: behaviours and mechanisms. Īzevedo R, Rodriguez E (2012) Phytotoxicity of mercury in plants: a review. Īyesha MS, Suryanarayanan TS, Nataraja KN et al (2021) Seed treatment with systemic fungicides: time for review. Īwual MR (2016) Solid phase sensitive palladium(II) ions detection and recovery using ligand based efficient conjugate nanomaterials. Īttari M, Bukhari SS, Kazemian H, Rohani S (2017) A low-cost adsorbent from coal fly ash for mercury removal from industrial wastewater. Īsad SA, Farooq M, Afzal A, West H (2019) Integrated phytobial heavy metal remediation strategies for a sustainable clean environment - a review. Īpitz SE, Elliott M, Fountain M, Galloway TS (2006) European environmental management: moving to an ecosystem approach. Īnirudhan TS, Shainy F (2015) Effective removal of mercury(II) ions from chlor-alkali industrial wastewater using 2-mercaptobenzamide modified itaconic acid-grafted-magnetite nanocellulose composite. vi + 263Īmirbahman A, Kent DB, Curtis GP, Marvin-Dipasquale MC (2013) Kinetics of homogeneous and surface-catalyzed mercury(II) reduction by iron(II). Arctic Monitoringand Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway/UNEP ChemicalsBranch, Geneva, Switzerland. Technical background report for the global mercury assessment 2013. Īlkorta I, Epelde L, Garbisu C (2017) Environmental parameters altered by climate change affect the activity of soil microorganisms involved in bioremediation. Īlimohammady M, Jahangiri M, Kiani F, Tahermansouri H (2018) Design and evaluation of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes by 3-aminopyrazole for the removal of Hg(II) and As(III) ions from aqueous solution. Īlijani H, Shariatinia Z (2018) Synthesis of high growth rate SWCNTs and their magnetite cobalt sulfide nanohybrid as super-adsorbent for mercury removal. Īlbergaria JT, da Alvim-Ferraz CMM, Delerue-Matos C (2006) Remediation efficiency of vapour extraction of sandy soils contaminated with cyclohexane: influence of air flow rate, water and natural organic matter content. Īi K, Ruan C, Shen M, Lu L (2016) MoS2 nanosheets with widened interlayer spacing for high-efficiency removal of mercury in aquatic systems. Īhamad T, Naushad M, Al-Maswari BM et al (2017) Synthesis of a recyclable mesoporous nanocomposite for efficient removal of toxic Hg2+ from aqueous medium. (99)00149-1Īdriano DC (1988) Lead, mercury, cadmium and arsenic in the environment. Ībumaizar RJ, Smith EH (1999) Heavy metal contaminants removal by soil washing. Ībraham AM, Kumar SV, Alhassan SM (2018) Porous sulphur copolymer for gas-phase mercury removal and thermal insulation. Graphical AbstractĪbbas K, Znad H, Awual MR (2018) A ligand anchored conjugate adsorbent for effective mercury(II) detection and removal from aqueous media. Overall, this review offers a comprehensive understanding of mercury contamination and the range of remediation techniques available to mitigate its adverse impacts. This review discusses the challenges associated with mercury pollution and remediation, including the need for effective monitoring and management strategies. The effectiveness of remediation techniques depends on the nature and extent of contamination and site-specific conditions. Various remediation strategies, including phytoremediation, bioremediation, chemical oxidation/reduction, and adsorption, have been developed to address mercury pollution, including physical, chemical, and biological approaches. Contamination can arise through various pathways, such as atmospheric deposition, water and soil contamination, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification in food chains. Natural sources of mercury include volcanic eruptions, while anthropogenic sources include industrial processes, artisanal and small-scale gold mining, and fossil fuel combustion. Mercury is a global pollutant that poses significant risks to human health and the environment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |